Wednesday, June 11, 2008

Regrets, I’ve had a few, but then again, too few to mention

Reuters reports from London:

President George W Bush admitted on Wednesday that his tough rhetoric had given the world the impression was a "guy really anxious for war" and said he now wished he had used a different tone on the global stage

In an interview with The Times, Bush said his main aim in the seven months before his presidency ends was to leave his successor a diplomatic framework for tackling Iran.

Bush voiced regret at divisions in the international community created by the war in Iraq, adding: "I think that in retrospect I could have used a different tone, a different rhetoric."

He admitted that his use of phrases such as "bring them on" and "dead or alive" had "indicated to people that I was, you know, not a man of peace."

Read entire article.

Gee, ya think? But George, I think your actions gave them that impression also. After all you preemptively invaded and are occupying a country that posed no threat to the United States. I don't think a reputation as a "man of peace" was in the cards no matter how you explained it.

When I first read this article I was excited that Bush might be starting to admit that he had made some mistakes – a crack in the certainty of his own righteousness. But after reading it several times and thinking about it I don't think these are true regrets. I think he is just trying to tell the Europeans what they want to hear. Words, after all, are easier to withdraw than troops.

2 comments:

Ellen Beth said...

I would suggest that invading a country for no good reason and lying to make it look like there was a good reason might hurt one's reputation as a "man of peace".

Dave Barrett said...

Yeah, the reputation as a "man of peace" seems really a stretch at this point. He should really set his sights lower. With more convincing remorse and a lot more regrets he could try for a "man of tragically misdirected good intentions."